Tesco – Be careful or they will basically accuse you of being a thief and ban you ….

Today I visited Tesco at Chichester and as usual scanned my Clubcard in order to use “scan as you shop” whereupon I got “error code 200”. I asked at customer services about this, they directed me to someone else, they directed me to a “duty manager” etc. It “transpires” that I allegedly “bought” a pair of trousers from the store which I didn’t scan. Now I accept that I am not, by any stretch of imagination, infallible. However, I do not appreciate the manner of resolution offered with regards to this matter. I was told to speak to the “checkout manager” (not there, which is not helpful particularly) about it. I don’t get into games of “ping pong” and I chose instead to call customer services who were, frankly, useless and basically gave me “it’s not my job” as their answer and wouldn’t direct to anyone who can deal with it.

I cannot accept the following:

  1. *IF* I did indeed get some trousers (I did get some at one point I admit) then why is the first I hear of it via being blocked from getting a scanner and being pushed from one member of staff to the next? You could have contacted me and shown me clearly that I did not pay for them (if that is the case) but NO, instead I am looked upon by your staff with barely disguised scorn. All you had to do was contact me, you know who I am and where I am, the Clubcard is registered to me after all.
  2. Being expected to wait for a specific person , in the store itself (who wasn’t there) is in itself ridiculous. You do know it’s 2017 right? We are all computerised now, I am well aware Tesco has plenty of computers in their stores and head office and to intimate that someone at customer services (I *BELIEVE* it’s Dundee?) can’t resolve this is bordering on ridiculous. To say it’s down to one man in the store itself is simply not right, what if he simply ignores my complaint (likely given my experiences so far)? What if he’s never there when I am? Etc etc.

So there you go Tesco, congratulations on basically accusing me of being a thief. You’re all over the Internet now. My advice to everybody else? Shop somewhere else ….

Steve – 07507 623504 – 

 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

£300 A Day For Basically Doing Naff All – Apply To: The House Of Lords FAO “Lord Adrian Palmer”

Best day care for the elderly! Peer’s amazing description of the Lords in BBC documentary that shows their pampered world. Peer living in 110-room home laments not being able to increase £300 allowance.

“A peer who lives in a 110-room mansion has lamented not being able to increase the £300 peers receive each day because of the ‘intolerable’ public outcry a pay rise would cause. Lord Palmer speaks out during a programme that has given a glimpse into the pampered world of the House of Lords. In the fly-on-the-wall documentary, another peer, Lord Tyler, calls the Lords the ‘best day care centre for the elderly in London’.

Members of the Lords get the £300 tax-free allowance each day just for turning up – even though some of them contribute nothing, according to claims in the BBC2 documentary. But Lord Palmer, who inherited his title 28 years ago and sits as a crossbench peer, said there would be an unwelcome backlash if they were paid more. The 65-year-old, whose stately home on the Scottish borders boasts a grand staircase fashioned from silver, told the programme: ‘If you think that today a high-powered accountant or lawyer is probably charging £600 an hour… but we get £300 a day. The Press outcry if we had a tiny rise would be just absolutely intolerable.’

The documentary, Meet The Lords, which begins next Monday, shows elderly peers snoozing on the red benches during a debate and drinking red wine at the ‘long table’ of their taxpayer-subsidised restaurant. Lib Dem Lord Tyler tells the programme: ‘It’s the best day care centre for the elderly in London. Families can drop in him or her and make sure that the staff will look after him very well – and he can have a snooze in the afternoon in the Chamber or in the library.’ Former Lords Speaker Baroness D’Souza says she once witnessed a peer leave a taxi waiting outside while he popped inside to ‘clock in’ and claim his tax-free £300 attendance allowance.

There are no checks on what a peer does after signing in, meaning unscrupulous members are free to leave immediately. Lady D’Souza’s intervention is all the more remarkable given that she came under fire in 2015 for charging £230 expenses for keeping her chauffeur-driven car waiting four hours while she went to the opera on official duty.”

Bollocks to this crap, I can’t read any more (all the above courtesy of the Daily Mail, which whilst not being the bastion of British journalism we might like has got this story pretty much right).

For the record I agree with the Lords, in PRINCIPLE. The idea of a second chamber which introduces checks and balances to our Parliamentary process seems like a pretty smart idea after all. We all know politicians are a bunch of mendacious, deceitful and manipulative chancers and schemers (well the vast majority of them, I do find myself warming to Theresa May somewhat now and Andrea Leadsom is kind of cool and sexy) that simply can’t be trusted to remain impartial, unbiased and act solely in the interests of the vox populi. Ergo, a second chamber of checks and balances = good idea. Right? Weeell, yes and no. First of all these are not elected and a succession of dubious appointments to the Lords by dubious governments (mostly Labour) means the Lords is now at least partially populated by people more interested in their own agendas and wallet/purse than those who actually see the job as what it really is: PUBLIC SERVANT; yes peers, what you are supposed to be is a public servant, your job is a well paid and prestigious “civil service” role ultimately. The job description might not say “civil servant” but that’s what it amounts to in the long run.

But where it gets even more shitty is the moaning about the money and the lack of “doing something” useful. Peers turning up to sign in just for the £300 a day (tax free) then pissing off to Soho or the Diogenes club or whatever it is these people do for “leisure”. Some of them sign in, and then NOTHING. There’s no check to make sure they’re doing anything for their £300 a day, heck there’s not even a check to make sure they stay there, all they have to is “sign in”. In this day and age this beggars belief. Our “leaders” and people in elated positions of responsibility need to be held accountable and that includes those Lords who are nothing but a drain on the economy.

The ultimate insult though is this obnoxious old goat Lord Palmer. He’s 65 (why aren’t you living on a pension?) with a 110 bedroom mansion on the Scottish borders (and no doubt the income, shares, stocks and hedge funds to pay for it) moaning that £300 a day isn’t much and they need a rise; justifying it by saying lawyers etc charge £600 an hour. Well fuck you Palmer. My wife is retired and she gets £110 a week, yes a week, not even a day. Plus you forgot to mention that despite those £600 an hour lawyers (another bloody rip off in my opinion) most of the populace earns a damn sight less, heck I know plenty of people who’d like £300 a week (tax free as well would be nice) but your statement stinks of “fuck ’em, let them eat cake”. Well fuck you and all you stand for.

Why is it so hard to get “value for money” out of our establishment? Being a Lord is a bloody “gravy train” and they know it. So if there ever comes a point where is a referendum re: the abolishment of the Lords I will vote for “kick the bastards out” even though I generally agree that we should have such an establishment. I’m sick of this bullshit rhetoric from overpaid, pompous arseholes who don’t understand what’s going “down” in the rest of the country for the rest of the population.

For £300 a day I’ll do it and heck I’d actually WORK when I got there.


PS Here’s our “esteemed” Lord, if you meet him feel free to tell him what an obnoxious “out of touch” twat he is (or even give him a swift kick in the “round objects”):

 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

“BUT BUT the ECONOMY!” Bollocks to trickle down economics ….

Ah yes the economy, the economy and the economy; which of course if you read much of the media is the ONLY thing that matters. Consequently the pro EU “remainers” have been running with “project fear” now for several months, before and after the Brexit referendum on June 23rd 2016. Of course the “spin” behind this is “if we leave the EU then we’re all DOOMED, economically DOOMED I tells ya”.

But look behind the purveyors of this spin, those people who want to keep us in the EU. You’ll find people with Hedge Funds in the EU, property portfolios across the European continent and basically people who make money out of being in the EU. The rest of us “plebs” who don’t have such luxuries (I myself am self employed and frankly it wouldn’t make a flying shit of difference to my business one way or the other, although very very slightly possibly in favour if we left, but that’s not for this discussion).  Virtually everybody I’ve met who wants us to stay in the EU is basically just selfish. The eBay seller who moaned her “stock” would go up because she buys from Germany, the guy with the Spanish wife, the guy who works in Gibraltar on some weird tax scam system and so on, it’s all been “me me me”. I myself voted out for a very simple reason, crudely put it goes like this:

“Government is mostly run by a bunch of mendacious career obsessed greedy politicians who neither listen nor care about the people they actually represent to the point of doing the exact opposite of the wishes of the their voters”. An EU parliament, for me, was another “layer” of useless, mendacious, greedy, freeloading politicians above them. I just figured 1 layer of governing arseholes was better than two layers. See my point?

Not so the remainers of course. No they have to try and browbeat us into “but but the ECONOMY“. Well here’s a thing for you people: some of us don’t care one way or the other. The socio-economic system we have is frankly shit for most of us. We’re told to “study hard, work hard” and we’ll succeed. BECAUSE trickle down economics works right? Does it hell, it doesn’t do anywhere near enough “trickling”, if anything it’s more a “trickly up” economic system. Maybe it’s time to smash this poxy system, because if we don’t it’s only a matter of a few years before the proverbial (and literal) pitchforks come out.


Anyone see “Witness For The Prosecution” over Christmas (damn good, go catch up on iPlayer). It’s a film noir style adaptation of an Agatha Christie play set in the 1920s. If you haven’t seen it then maybe you saw the original Upstairs Downstairs? Life in the 1920s was shit for most people. It wasn’t all “flappers” and cocktails and so on for the vast majority of people and we still had people tugging their forelocks to nobles and all the rest of it. Life was a struggle after the 1st World War and then when the 2nd World War came along this bullshit system was finally broken, at least to some extent

Sadly we’re going back to that, except the “titled” people aren’t that they’re money men. People who make money from the EU, like “hahaha I sold 20 million Euros today for US dollars and made £500,000 profit I am going to spend it on hookers and cocaine” etc. Rich remainers are people who are worried that their “fund” is only going to make £15,000,000 this year instead of £17,000,000 whilst the likes of me (the so called JAMs) are struggling to get together a deposit for a new rental because I want to move because my rent is frankly extortionate. I did the “study hard, work hard” thing (seriously the letters after my name are probably twice as long as my name and those who know me know I use my FULL name, middle name and all.) I’ve studied my brains out and worked my proverbial bollocks off, like so many other people of course and frankly (even if they don’t know what “trickle down economics” means) think the system we have now simply sucks.

So bollocks to the chants “BUT BUT the ECONOMY!” Fuck you, you mean YOUR economy, your POCKETS, not mine. Maybe the system needs to be smashed and rebuilt. Don’t get me wrong I’m no socialist but heck there has to be something in between? Because the current system sure as hell blows. Trickle down economics my aching arse, just sod right off and bollocks to the “BUT BUT the ECONOMY” whiners.

Here’s what really happens, eg “shit down economics” (incidentally if you think my bad language is “unnecessary” then you can fuck off, it is necessary in order to emphasise the point):


 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Fuck you Hermes you useless shower of shite. @myhermes @hermes


Hermes are without one of the most useless incompetent courier/parcel firms I have had the misfortune to use. The actual “courier” is fine, she turns up with the parcels, collects them and off she goes (Jackie from Chidham, a pleasant enough lady). But heaven forbid something go “wrong”, such as a Jackie being off sick, or her car has blown up or whatever. The local Hermes depot is staffed by incompetent morons who have absolutely no contingency plan for such problems and the parcels just “sit” here waiting to be collected, and given we usually get a Hermes delivery to us every other day (give or take a bit) and I haven’t seen one in days well …. This suggests Jackie is either ill, the car’s blown, she’s quit or whatever and the local depot’s “contingency plan” has failed to “kick in”, oh hang on, that’ll be the plan they don’t have ….

I myself have been in the transport industry, as a despatch rider, a multidrop van and lorry driver, an HGV driver and even a “rope and sheeting” type driver delivering heavy machinery. I am produ to say that I have NEVER ever failed a delivery or collection ever due to any incomptence on the part of the company I was working for. I’ve sat in Dagenham for 2 hours refusing to move until the lazy sods who work at Ford “goods in” took the palettes I’d delivered, I’ve “handballed” parcels and even heavy machinery from the back of a truck at 9pm on a Sunday night in London’s West End, heck I even delivered the server that was for the Queen’s first ever internet Christmas message at 2am on Christmas Day morning.

Not Hermes though, they are the most useless bunch of cockwombles ever. They simply couldn’t give a damn. I spent over 40 minutes waiting to get through on “chat” (because you can’t call them) and the resolution? There wasn’t one, all they did is was suggest I re-book the collections or take them to the local drop off shop. Well FUCK YOU Hermes I’m not here to fix your bloody incompetence, you should have sorted it out when you had the chance. Now you’ve not only a lost a customer but created someone who is going to hate and despise your crap organisation for the rest of their life (and boy am I going to advertise the fact). Fuck you and fuck you and fuck you again, useless incompetent retards. As for the customer service via “chat”, fuck me are they useless? See for yourself:

Neha: Hi, my name is Neha. How may I help you?
Steve Williams: First of all please don’t say anything like “I’m sorry to hear that” and other meaningless platitudes!
Steve Williams: Secondly I am still waiting for a number of parcels to be collected
Steve Williams: None have been collected the next day like they were supposed and go back to last weekend
Steve Williams: plus nobody can be bothered to answer my emails
Steve Williams: What I want to hear is what is going to be done about it and WHY they haven’t been collected
Steve Williams: there’s a number of orders and they’re all on the account
Neha: I am sorry about this Steve.
Steve Williams: Please no “I am sorry” stuff
Steve Williams: JUST WHEN ARE THEY GOING to be collected
Steve Williams: and why haven’t they been
Neha: Just so I understand clearly your parcel was not collected on allocated day and you have not received any response from us.
Steve Williams: numerous parcels yes
Steve Williams: not just the one
Steve Williams: my depot (I believe it is Havant) is utterly incompetent and seem to have no contingency plan for when they are busy or the driver unable or whatever
Steve Williams: They manage to collect from the local Parcelshop but seem utterly incapable of collecting from home pickups which we are PAYING extra for.
Neha: I can understand your situation. There is technical issue due the courier has not received the collection request. However we request you to please drop the parcel at drop off point or cancel and rebook the shipment.
Steve Williams: That is not satisfactory, I PAID for collection from here. I want them collected from here. I am in and out all the time but someone is always at home. Also, a “technical issue”? Seriously? Just ring the depot up and shout at them.
Steve Williams: Technical error sounds extremely “made up excusey”
Steve Williams: Does Hermes want to lose a customer? This is not good enough, I want them picked up TODAY, delivered TOMORROW and the “collection by courier” part refunded, plus a further partial refund for gross incompetence.
Neha has disconnected.
Sudipta: Hi, my name is Sudipta. How may I help you?
Steve Williams: Why was the last person disconnected
Sudipta: I am sorry you got disconnected from the previous agent.
Steve Williams: Please no “I am sorry” stuff
Sudipta: May be due to system issue you got disconnected.
Steve Williams: I just want these parcels collected
Steve Williams: None have been collected the next day like they were supposed and go back t last weekend, nobody is answering my emails
Steve Williams: What I want to hear is what is going to be done about it and WHY they haven’t been collected
Steve Williams: there’s a number of orders and they’re all on the account
Steve Williams: also none of this “take them to the Parcelshop” stuff, that’s not an option
Steve Williams: I paid for them to be collected from my address and expect that to be done.
Steve Williams: there’s a number of orders and they’re all on the account
Steve Williams: Does Hermes want to lose a customer? This is not good enough, I want them picked up TODAY, delivered TOMORROW and the “collection by courier” part refunded, plus a further partial refund for gross incompetence.
Sudipta: I am sorry the parcels were not collected.
Steve Williams: Stop it with the SORRY, you’re not sorry
Sudipta: Could you please provide the sixteen digit tracking number?
Steve Williams: I jus want to know what you’re going to do about it
Steve Williams: there’s more than one hence I said
Steve Williams: I am looking at the parcels in the site “back end” and all I see is our ref numbers not the tracking numbers
Sudipta: I am sorry I an unable to pull any details from theemail address you have provided above.
Steve Williams: is this the right number?
Steve Williams: it says “barcode” in the back end
Steve Williams: 5719770246038780
Steve Williams: and 8462898250707082
Steve Williams: and 9594134249515784
Sudipta: Thank you. Please give me a moment while I check this for you.
Sudipta: I would request you to cancel the order and rebook it again.
Steve Williams: That is not an option, I want to ring them up and shout at them because my depot is utterly useless, I can’t wait any longer for these to go so please stop obfuscating and just get them collected
Steve Williams: Stop trying to make it my problem, it’s hermes mess, hermes should fixc it
Steve Williams: fix
Steve Williams: If it’s not fixed BY HERMES there will be repurcussions
Steve Williams: Not only will you lose a customer but I will become a very large thorn in Hermes’ side
Steve Williams: asking me to fix it isn’t customer service it’s a fob off
Steve Williams: You need to start going out of your way to keep me as a customer because this isn’t the first time this has happened
Sudipta: I am sorry you are unhappy with the service provided, however, in order to get your parcel collected you need to cancel the order and rebook or drop off the parcel at the parcelShop.
Steve Williams: no you can fix it, ring the depot and tell them to do it, your response is not satisfactory
Steve Williams: If you can’t do that personally then connect me to someone who can, that solution is not good enough
Sudipta: You can contact us by calling 03303336556. Please start by selecting option 1 for tracking a parcel. After this please select option 5 as you are the shipper. Once prompted to, please enter the tracking number followed by the # sign. The interactive voice response will provide the current status of the parcel and provide three options after that. Please select option 3.
Steve Williams: NO, you fix it
Steve Williams: I am not fixing your company’s mistakes
Steve Williams: you’re customer service right? so let’s see some customer service instead of “customer fob off”
Steve Williams: seriously I am logging all of this, if Hermes doesn’t fix it it’s going to be all over the internet and to every eBay Powerseller I know and I know a lot
Steve Williams: I have “influence” in the eComemrce world
Steve Williams: ecommerce even
Steve Williams: your “solutions” are simply not good enough
Sudipta: I will need to forward this issue on to our investigations team. They will contact the courier and chase this parcel’s collection within 24-48 hours.
Steve Williams: No they won’t, you will tell them NOW and I expect it to be within the hours, 24 hours is no good, I’ve already waited several days
Steve Williams: “within the hour” I meant to say, I am seriosuly angry right now hence the typos
Sudipta: I am sorry however, this the standard time frame.
Steve Williams: Do you really consider 24 to 48 hours satisfactory in this circumstance?
Steve Williams: Don’t talk to me about “standard time frames”
Steve Williams: I’ve waited several days “past” the standard “time frame” for these to be collected
Sudipta: I am sorry the parcel was not collected.
Steve Williams: well stop being sorry and fix it
Sudipta: This the best I can assist you with .
Steve Williams: What me on to someone who can better then
Steve Williams: This is not good enough
Steve Williams: I mean “put me on to someone who can do better” sigh
Steve Williams: Nothing personal against you but so far all you’ve done is say sorry and not offered to fix it.
Steve Williams: Ring them up and scream at them
Steve Williams: If that’s what it takes
Sudipta: You can contact us by calling 03303336556. Please start by selecting option 1 for tracking a parcel. After this please select option 5 as you are the shipper. Once prompted to, please enter the tracking number followed by the # sign. The interactive voice response will provide the current status of the parcel and provide three options after that. Please select option 3.
Steve Williams: NO
Steve Williams: You fix it, Hermes cock up Hermes should fix it. I am way too busy to fix your mistakes
Steve Williams: I’ve already told you that is not a satisfactory resolution
Sudipta: I will need to forward this issue on to our investigations team.
Sudipta: This the best I can assist you with.
Steve Williams: Put me on to somebody who can actually do something
Steve Williams: I waited over 40 minutes to get through on “chat” and expect far more.
Steve Williams: you must have a line manager or supervisor, pt them on
Sudipta: Could you please provide the contact number so that I can forward this to the concerned team?
Steve Williams: 07507 623504
Steve Williams: I’m not ending this conversation until they call, 24 hours is not satisfactory
Steve Williams: where’s your line manager
Sudipta: Thank you for the number.
Sudipta: I will arrange a call back to you.
Steve Williams: NOW
Steve Williams: not 24 hours
Sudipta: Thank you for contacting us at myHermes. Have a good day.
Sudipta has disconnected.


PS: in case you think I was “exaggerating” about the waiting time:


 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

If you think it’s “inhumane” to age test “child” immigrants then frankly you’re a tosser

Don’t carry on reading this if you’re easily offended, there’s going to be some swearing and yes it is necessary…. Yesterday I was “out and about” (mainly Southampton but that’s beside the point) and like I often do when out during the day, I tuned into Radio 2. Now the Jeremy Vine show (formerly the Jimmy Young show) can be a bit “controversial” and yesterday they were talking about the “age” of the supposed “children” coming from the Calais jungle and whether we should have age tests to see if they are children or not.

Well is it just me? You don’t need to be Sherlock fucking Holmes to see these people are NOT children for fuck’s sake. EVEN (and that’s a very dubious “even”) if these immigrants are “children” they’re not the “vulnerable” children that we’re supposed to be bringing to the United Kingdom are they, these are blokes big enough and ugly enough (as the expression goes) to look after themselves. There’s no young children, no girls, nobody disabled etc. “Vulnerable my arse” as Ricky Tomlinson’s character Jim Royle would no doubt say.


Now here comes my next bit of “ire”. There were people ringing in, emailing etc to the Jeremy Vine show to say it would be “inhumane” to subject these immigrants to age tests. WTF planet are we living on? How can testing someone’s age in order to prioritise for genuinely vulnerable children be inhumane? I’ll tell you what’s inhumane, cheating the bloody system so genuinely vulnerable children lose out. I’ll tell you what’s inhumane, being subjected to a battery of bullshit tests and arbitrary criteria by arseholes at job centres or organisations like Concentrix in order to “qualify” for benefits when you’re disabled etc. If you’re one of those people who think its “inhumane” to test these immigrants for their age then frankly I think you are a blinkered lefty tree hugging bleeding heart liberal cunt.

This country has gone bloody mad.


PS if you think my bad language is “unnecessary” then you can fuck off, it is necessary in order to emphasise the point.


 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Elected representatives who don’t actually “represent” the people who voted for them

Well this isn’t going to be a popular post with some people but I’m going to write it anyway. There’s a lot of “huff and puff” going down lately with regards to immigration problems, racism, Nazism and the effect on the politics of various countries such as the USA, the United Kingdom and Germany.

First up let’s talk “Brexit”. The United Kingdom is a democratically led country with parliament elected to represent the wishes and desires of the majority vote that put said party into power, eg the “vox populi” and its wishes. The majority vote spoke out, people want Brexit and this may (or may not) be due to immigration into the country (I suspect it mostly is). The United Kingdom government has failed consistently to recognise its people’s wishes, consequently failing to do its job, which is to represent the people that voted for them. Time and time again we have been “stitched up” by governments who have done what they thought was the “right thing to do” for the populace without actually asking the public; the mere fact that the United Kingdom has had so few referendums is indicative of this. I appreciate that we can’t have a referendum to decide every single little thing but stuff like leaving the ERM (Exchange Rate Mechanism), leaving the EU, the Lisbon Treaty and more, should have ALL been subject to a referendum. It doesn’t matter how “thick” or “stupid” you may think “the public” the point is the party runs the country for the people and if the people’s wishes (no matter how stupid they may seem to you if you are a MP) are not followed then EVENTUALLY the public are going to get mightily pissed off. Can’t say as I blame them really.

As for Brexit, this is democracy in action, the majority said “out” so the moaning “remainers” should just keep quiet and live with it. I recall many years ago the despair I felt when Tony Blair got into power (we all know what a disaster he turned out to be) yet you didn’t see me campaigning outside the Houses Of Parliament demanding a new election, I just accepted it, after all the MAJORITY VOTE said “Labour”. Now I accept the system is a bit “naff” with the whole first past the post system but it’s the system that needs changing, if you didn’t like it then why didn’t everybody vote in the “alternative vote” referendum?

Then there’s Germany. I am fortunate to know a lot of Germans from my Commodore 64 and Amiga hacking days of the 1980s and 1990s and on the whole they’re all very nice guys, pretty normal, much the same as you and me, just German. Now even many Germans are starting to say “enough” towards immigration. Angela Merkel’s party has taken a major setback and now the Alternative For Germany party is set to enter the German Parliament for the first time ever. Why am I not surprised? It’s only a matter of time (in my opinion) before we have something similar in France.

Then there’s the USA. Boy is this a hotbed of spin and bullshit. Would Hillary Clinton be a good President? Damned if I know. Would Donald Trump be a good President? Again damned if I know, he might after all. The point is he is telling many people what they want to hear. Guess what if people are pissed off enough that works. Then you end with far right politics and all because the previous administrations/governments couldn’t be arsed to do WHAT the people that voted for them wanted. For my money the USA will get the President it wants, whether that’s Clinton or Trump as ultimately your country should be led by the people who represent what YOU want not by what they think is “best for you”.

Whoever runs a country would do well to remember this. Represent the wishes of the people who voted for you, that’s what a representative democracy is supposed to be, not some system for you to further your political career and piss people off with a load of things they don’t want. We’re grown ups, we understand we need some austerity, tightening the belts and all that. But also many of us don’t want uncontrolled immigration. I myself have considered emigration and even with all my experience, qualifications and other “skills” (I speak more than one language) it’s a “no” from everywhere pretty much, why doesn’t the UK have immigration like that? Oh hang on it does, if you’re a surgeon from Australia or a rocket scientist from the USA. But once you’re in the EU block it seems to be a “free for all” and in a country the size of the United Kingdom this simply can’t carry on.


PS some figures:

The United Kingdom (England, Wales, Scotland & Northern Ireland) is (give or take a bit) 94,000 square miles and has around 65 million inhabitants (well the ones we know about). The USA is about 3,800,000 square miles and has a population of around 320 million. You don’t need to be a genius to see the problem …. And if you think “my that’s a lot less densely populated than the UK”, wait until you see this: Russia is about 17,100,000 square miles with 144 million inhabitants. Not only that but Russia is a lot closer to the Eastern European countries and Syria etc that people want to emigrate from ….

 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

An open letter to UK politicians (especially Conservatives) re: Brexit

It’s time the lot of you grew some testicles. The vox populi has made it clear that the majority want us to leave the economic basket case that is the European Union (is Greece going to default on its re-payment in the next few days?) so you should "man up" (yes even the ladies) and get on with it.

You seem to forget we live in a democracy and no matter how wrong you think the "Brexiters" were you have to follow the majority’s wish, that’s what democracy is, go look it up in the dictionary if you don’t believe me. Instead of whining about it or talking of voting against triggering article 50 and having a veto you should just get on and do it.

The people of the United Kingdom have spoken, because they are sick of you, the lot of you, you’re all hopelessly useless, you only join parliament as a "career move", what happened to "being in service to your country"? Remember you are, at the end of the day, still just glorified "civil servants". The clue is the job title, eg the "SERVANT" part. We give you power (or take it away) every general election so that you will represent the majority wish.

Think of this as a chance to show the disillusioned people that you can do what you’re told, you can be responsible and do what we wish and maybe, just maybe, we might have some respect for you in the future.

  • Dr Steve Antony Williams (Chichester)
  • Mike Craig (Salford)
  • Jackie Sutton (Horsham)
  • Jean Williams (Chichester)
  • David Sutton (Chichester)
  • Stefan Canziani (London)
  • Rik Jones (Cornwall)
  • Peter Johnson (Luton)
  • Karl Walters (Sheffield)
  • Michael Sanderson (Crawley)
  • Peter jones (Brighton)
  • Alex McKechnie (Edinburgh)
  • Lisa Savage (Wolverhampton)
  • Tom Savage (Wolverhampton)
  • John Bright (York)
  • John Walters (Durham)
  • Susan Walters (Durham)
  • Irene Garner (Liskeard)
  • Keith Garner (Liskeard)
  • David Williamson (Dover)
  • Dominic Wilson (Birmingham)
  • Karen Jones (Swindon)
  • Peter Jones (Swindon)
  • Brian Jones (Swindon)
  • Nigel Parris (Crawley)
  • David Simmonds (Middlesborough)
  • Theresa Simmonds (Middlesborough)
  • Dr Paul Grant (Croydon)
  • Jessica Sutton (Horsham)
  • Jane Sutton (Redhill)
  • Jennifer Engles (Maidstone)
  • Jason Dawson (Thornton Heath)
  • Janet Dawson (Thornton Heath)
  • Peter Harris (Catford, London)
  • Susannah Harris (Catford, London)
  • Denise Williams (St Albans)
  • Tamsin Follows (Stoke On Trent)
  • David Parr (Trowbridge)
  • Darren Cooper (Worthing)
  • Clive Smith (Wandsworth, London)
  • Tina Smith (Wandsworth, London)
  • Paul Cooper (Wolverhampton)
  • Kim Cooper (Wolverhampton)
  • Tony Ward (St Albans)
  • Jim Mattison (Ramsgate)
  • Mureed Hussain Shah (Luton)
  • Mike Taylor (Grantham)
  • Dawn Sweet (Stoke On trent)
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
3 Comments  comments 

Reasons to leave the sinking ship that is the EU

Published on 4th June 2016 by in Opinion


Reasons why we should leave the EU …. Ok, so I’ve written about this before and I know everybody’s sick of hearing about it but I’m sick of hearing the same old tired arguments about the economy. So, without further ado:


Now I’m no politics student (in my defence I do have a combined honours degree which is partly economics and also studied politics at college prior to entering university the second time) but I know what a democracy is supposed to be. The dictionary definition is pretty straight forward and goes along the lines of: “Democracy, or democratic government, is a system of government in which all the people of a state are involved in making decisions about its affairs, typically by voting to elect representatives to a parliament or similar assembly”. So in other words, being pragmatic about it, we can’t have a referendum for every single thing, so we elect a political party based on the idea that they will do what the vox populi (voice of the people) wants. Ok so it’s far from perfect, Cameron’s never done anything useful that I wanted but I suppose I can’t complain, I didn’t vote Conservative last time. The key point is the party is elected to power and if, heaven forbid, we screw it up we can just re-elect in a few years and boot them out.

However, EU laws are made by the EU Commission, whose members are appointed to their role, not elected. In other words major laws are made which affect UK citizens by somebody you’ve never heard of in an office building in Belgium or wherever. Did you also know the EU has five presidents? None are elected. It’s bad enough having an elected mendacious “spiv” like Cameron in charge but how annoyed would you be if he was simply Prime Minister because he was “given” the role? Of course, what the EU is therefore is “old boy’s network” of dodgy handshakes and elite university connections and “jobs for the boys” who probably don’t even deserve those jobs in the first place.  Democracy isn’t perfect (especially not ours) but on the whole it’s probably the least offensive “workable” form of government we have in the world, whereas socialism and the like inevitably fail because somebody always abuses it. Do you want to live in a democracy or something else? Do you want people who you neither know nor elected to have power over you? I certainly don’t, I would much rather live in a democratic state like we have now, even though it is flawed, at least we can boot the Conservatives out in 3 or 4 years if we want for being ineffective, mendacious and incompetent.


Oh God here we go …. I just know somebody is going to call me out on racism here …. See, the thing is if most people want to emigrate to another country it’s tough, I mean really tough. I myself have looked at emigrating to Canada. I’m not stupid, I have a number of degrees, A levels, speak 4 languages and a number of useful workplace skills. BUT, even Canada, I don’t score enough points, nor Australia, nor New Zealand. Yet you want to come to the UK? Welcome in, with open arms etc ….

I have no issue with refugees, heck, if you’re trying to escape a war and so on then I don’t blame you and that’s fair enough. But coming here for a better way of life, the so called “economic migrants”, has to be a no. This isn’t racism, it simply is a question of space and resources. England is Europe’s most crowded country. Most of us (eg the real people, not the politicians and corporate CEOs) haven’t got over the 2008/2009 recession yet. Our resources are pretty much jammed solid, be they schools, hospitals or whatever. Realistically we simply can’t take any more. Let’s put it in perspective shall we? The United Kingdom (England, Wales, Scotland & Northern Ireland) is (give or take a bit) 94,000 square miles and has around 65 million inhabitants (well the ones we know about). The USA is about 3,800,000 square miles and has a population of around 320 million. You don’t need to be a genius to see the problem …. And if you think that’s “my that’s a lot less densely populated than the UK”, wait until you see this: Russia is about 17,100,000 square miles with 144 millions inhabitants. Not only that but Russia is a lot closer to the Eastern European countries and Syria etc that people want to immigrate from ….

UK Citizens don’t want to stop immigration, they want “controlled” immigration, like much of the rest of the world has in fact, this island is “full”.


The Eurozone is in dangerous decline, basically it’s a sinking ship. Unemployment is around 24% in Greece, 20% in Spain, 12% in Italy and so on. The European continent is littered with massive debt (Greece springs to mind) and stagnant economies. Did you know that Europe is the only continent in the world (well aside from Antarctica if you want to nit pick) that is not growing? How can jobs thrive in such an environment? The only thing that “thrives” is the people at the top because they can impose more on the workers and get away with it. Zero hours contracts, poor increases in minimum wage, discriminatory hiring policy and so on. You’ve heard of “trickle down economics” right? The only people benefiting right now are the recipients of the “flow upwards” economics structure. Which bring us nicely onto ….


The EU favours big business. EU rules on tax enable large multinational global corporations (Amazon, Google and so on) to select and relocate to different legal jurisdictions and tax regimes. Why do you think eBay and Amazon are registered in Luxembourg? Cheaper tax. Worse still the EU “system” allows these companies to abuse things even further by not closing loopholes where monies are moved from country to country to minimise tax (Double Dutch & Irish or whatever the latest “fiddle” is). Politicians have always been mendacious and disreputable but nowadays they are worse than ever, taking corporate back handers, hiding money offshore, lining up director of the board jobs and all the rest of it. Who suffers? We all do, it’s “flow upwards” economics again. Small businesses are demolished by the behemoth that is online retail and supermarkets and all the rest of it. To top it all most small businesses in the UK are swimming in paperwork, petty bureaucracy and red tape, all EU imposed. Not to mention the industries the EU effectively demolished, such as the UK fishing industry. Want to know why cod and chips is so expensive down the chip shop? Blame the EU fishing quotas.


Ok, go out. Seriously, go pop yourself in a lay-by someplace and watch cars go by. How many are German, French, Italian? (mostly German) Trade with the EU isn’t going to stop if we leave the EU, do you think BMW, Volkswagen and Mercedes will say “go boil your head you silly British we can’t sell cars to you anymore”? Of course not. The shops are littered with European products, cheese from France, beer from Germany, salami from Italy and so on. This stuff is still going to be on the shelves, French cheese manufacturers aren’t stupid, they will still sell it to the British, trade agreement or no trade agreement.

Besides trade agreements are irrelevant. “Stuff” comes from all over the world. My house is littered with things made in China, there’s New Zealand lamb in the freezer, Australian beer in the fridge and so on. Heck there’s even some American chocolate here someplace (nasty stuff!) As far as trade is concerned the EU is irrelevant, we live in a “global village” now, we don’t need special “clubs” to negotiate our trade.


As has been well advertised, the United Kingdom currently contributes £350,000,000 a week to the EU in “funds”. Ok, I hear the “remain” campaigners cry “but we get a rebate” etc. Even so we are still basically “giving” the EU £161,000,000 a week and getting very little in return (plus the rebate amount will go down in time). To add insult to injury the “rebate funds” have to be spent where the EU directs us to, which of course gives the EU the chance to say “look how generous we are, this money came from the EU”. Now think about it carefully, you give your neighbour £350 a week and they give you £189 back, insist on how you spend that £189 and then tell you how generous they are. I know we’re not all Mathematics geniuses but come on I don’t need my (largely redundant) A Level in Mathematics to see that’s just a load of crap. I’d rather just tell the neighbours to sod off.


Have you ever been a management consultant? I worked for one of those firms who come into a business in their Armani suits with their laptops and spreadsheets and then leave telling you what you already knew! One of the things they often advise is either fragmentation, or the opposite which is centralisation, neither tend to work particularly well. You can’t centralise all the countries into one giant federal super-state, it simply won’t work, there’s just too many differing cultures, economies and opinions. Greece will never be like England or Germany in terms of economy or culture, they just don’t work our way. Why do you think the world has so many countries? Because each country tends to be a neat(ish) divide of cultures, beliefs and so on. China is next to Russia but they’ve not got a lot in common really (well failed communism I guess), they’re not likely to join up. Japan doesn’t want to be part of China, they don’t need to be, same as we don’t need to be part of Europe. So why give away what power this country does have?

Finally, why we should leave:

Business will have the chance to thrive (remember there are far more small and medium businesses in this country than there are big multinationals) because they will be freed from EU bureaucracy, red tape and interference. Trade with the EU will continue, we’ll still be able to buy BMWs, brie, salami and sauerkraut. We won’t be giving the EU £350,000,000 a year, we can spend that on something else and whilst I am not naïve enough to think it would get spent on the NHS it’s a heck of a lot of money that can be spent right here on our own people.

We will retain our democracy, be able to elect who we choose to govern us and be able to boot them out if they’re rubbish a few years later. Immigration will continue but it will become harder, we won’t be seen as such a “soft touch”. As for elitism, have you not noticed who has tends to have the loudest voices when shouting “better off in”? The big corporations, the CEO fat cats, the “top” 5% when it comes to wealth, if you vote out you are giving them a metaphorical boot in the gonads.  They want to stay in simply because it’s better for THEM, not for the people as whole.

We have many things to our advantage, London is still the most important city in the world financially acting as a large “hub” of all matters financial, we have some of the greatest scientists and scientific advances and some of the world’s greatest products come from right here. Let’s keep it that way and vote out. You know it makes sense, don’t take my word for it, listen to Daniel Hannan on the video clip below ….


#brexit #voteout #voteleave

 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

#Brexit and why I shall be voting “out”

So, an EU referendum. I’m a little tired of hearing most of the “better off in” merchants shouting about how we should stay in because of the economy, jobs or cheap olive oil or whatever. Also, I am sick and tired of the way the “better off inners” constantly seem to imply that the leavers are bigoted, ignorant xenophobes. One of the things we constantly hear from the “inners” is “where’s your evidence” when we put forward one of the reasons why we want “out”. To that I say: “where’s YOUR evidence?” See, thing is we don’t know what will happen either way we go. The inners have no better idea than the outers do. The world is a complex system, in politics, economies, cultures and so on. Nobody really knows what will happen if we leave, nobody knows what will happen if we stay in, ultimately it’s all speculation from either perspective.

However, thing is we live in a democracy and whilst I accept we elect our politicians to govern us in our best interests the reality is the vox populi’s interests aren’t particularly well represented and when we do get the chance to vote democratically we get skewed information and bias; for example the government leaflet sent to every British household at a cost of £9,000,000 Way to go Conservatives, where’s the leaflet telling people the reasons we’d be better off in?

Myself I want out. I was too young to vote for the Common Market back in the 1970s and therefore never had any say in the matter whatsoever and later we were dragged into “Europe” deeper and deeper, again without any input from the likes of me or indeed anyone else of the vox populi, whether they thought it was a good idea or not. Myself, I think the common market was a good idea. Free trade, what’s not to like? But we never saw what was going to happen in the future, we all thought that human beings had got beyond bickering, cheating and all the rest of it. But it seems not, we have countries such as Greece, lying about their economy in order to enter the EU and pestered about a currency few people seem to want here. The problem as I see it, is intrinsically we are all too different. Europe has a very eclectic range of nations and their cultures which doesn’t seem to allow for homogeny into a union. In my opinion we have more in common with Americans, Australians, Canadians and so on and not just the common language.

Way I see it, if we leave we face a lot of problems, but there again we’re facing a different set of problems if we stay in. I can’t see the EU ever working, as I said we don’t have much in common. Don’t get me wrong I have nothing against other Europeans and am lucky to have friends in the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland and Germany plus family in Italy.

Ultimately the people of this country will be asked a question that nobody has asked them for 42 years: “Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union?” The arguments “for” are much the same as they were in 1975 that we will be a poor, racist and lonely little island and can’t survive without the rest of Europe. Of course the reality is we don’t know if any of this would happen.

Ultimately I think the EU is a big disaster waiting to happen, a sinking ship if you will and being purely selfish I think we should make like rats and abandon now. Of course leaving is going to be fraught with problems as well but this is, in my opinion, the lesser evil, in the long run. I don’t want to see British sovereignty just “given away” to a federal European Union, which in my opinion will never work. As for the free trade? Even if we didn’t sign a free-trade deal with the EU, we would have to pay, at most, £7.5 billion a year in tariffs for access to EU markets and compared to what we pay to be members that’s a drop in the Atlantic.


 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 

Who You Calling A C*nt?

Was perusing an old hard drive last night when I came across some MP3s I didn’t recognise. They turned out to be a selection of comedy sketches, some Ben Elton for example, Eddie Izzard and Derek and Clive …. I’d forgotten about Derek and Clive, although of course it’s all a “bit before my time” whereas Ben Elton was at his height when I was in my late teens.

If you’ve not heard Derek and Clive (Peter Cook & Dudley Moore) you might on first hearing consider this to be simply puerile and offensive drivel but I don’t know I find something humorous about it, but I’m a bloke so puerile and lavatory humour, well you get the idea. So anyway, Derek and Clive (according to my wife, she being significanlty older than me and remembering it so much better from the time) caused merry hell at the time and the complaints came streaming in, although I guess it wouldn’t cause so much outrage now as it did then. However, one sketch might, due to the fact that many people object to word “cunt.” This of course is called the “cunt Sketch” (how appropriate I guess.) Puerile? Offensive? Sure, but still funny and superb in its austere minimalism and at least they were funny unlike that total cunt Frankie Boyle 😉

Here it is, in it’s glory:

Dud: I tell you, the other day, some bloke came up to me, I dunno who it was, an’ he said, “You cunt.”

Pete: Yeah.

Dud: I said, “Wot?” ‘E said: “You cunt.”

Pete: Yeah, and you replied, “You fuckin’ cunt.”

Dud: I said … well, no, not straight away … I said: “You cunt,” I said …

Pete: Yeah, yeah …

Dud: … An’ then ‘e said …

Pete: … What’d he come back with?

Dud: ‘E come back, ‘e says, ‘e said “You fuckin’ cunt.”

Pete: You’re jokin’!

Dud: ‘E said, “You call me a …”

Pete: ‘E said “You fuckin’ cunt”?

Dud: ‘E said, “You call me a cunt? You fuckin’ cunt! …” I said, “You f—,” I said, “You fuckin’ cunt.”

Pete: I should ‘ope so. “You fuckin’ cunt …”

Dud: I said, “You fuckin’ cunt.” I said, “You fuckin’ come ‘ere an’ call me a fuckin’ cunt …”

Pete: I should say so.

Dud: I said, “You f—,” I said, “You cunt.” I said, “You fuckin’ cunt.” I said, “‘Oo are you fuckin’ callin’ cunt, cunt?”

Pete: Yeah, what’d ‘e say, cunt?

Dud: ‘E said, “You fuckin’ cunt!”

Pete: Well, you fuckin’ cunt! ‘Oo are you to say to ‘im that ‘e was a fuckin’ cunt?

Dud: Well, what d’you f—, what d’you fuckin’ think, mate? I’m fuckin’ defendin’ my fuckin’ self, aren’t I?

Pete: Well no. ‘E come up to you, call you “cunt,” that’s fair enough, or ‘e said, “You fuckin’ cunt,” an’ you said back to ‘im, “You fuckin’ fuckin’ cunt,” …

Dud: I said, well …

Pete: … well, what d’you expect ‘im to say back, apart from, “You fuckin’ stupid fuckin’ cunt”?

Dud: Well, I don’t … I don’t expect nothin’, do I?

Pete: No …

Dud: But the cunt come back with, “You fuckin’ cunt, cunt.”

Pete: Oh Christ.

Dud: I said, “You cunt?” I said, “You callin’ me a fuckin’ cunt? You fuckin’ …” I said, “You fuckin’ cunt.”

Pete: Jesus Christ, yeah.

Dud: I said, “You …,” I said, “You … you fuckin’ cunt!” …

Pete: Yeah …

Dud: … I said, like that.

Pete: Yeah. You said it, like that, did you? To ‘im.

Dud: Yeah.

Pete: Or was ‘e gone by then?

Dud: No, ‘e fuckin’ ‘it me. F— …

Pete: ‘It you, did ‘e?

Dud: Yeah, fuckin’ cunt.

Pete: Killed you dead, did ‘e?

Dud: No, ‘e … ‘e fuckin’ ‘it me.

Pete: Yeah, …

Dud: I said …

Pete: … well …

Dud: I said …

Pete: … you can’t blame ‘im, can you?

Dud: I said, “You … you rotter.”

Pete: Yeah.

Dud: An’ ‘e … ‘e went off.

Pete: Did ‘e?

Dud: An’ ‘e said, “You cunt,” again.

Pete: Well, that’s the only way to deal with ‘im, isn’t it?

Dud: Yeah, well, I showed ‘im, didn’t I?

Pete: Yeah, well, you ‘ad to, didn’t you? You ‘ad to stand up for what you stood for, didn’t you?

 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments